Johnny
I completely disagree, some thing's authenticity has nothing to do with routine or quality. Authenticity is simply honest self expression. it's about the emotion and immersion of the person/s who are producing said thing.
Johnny Inauthentic is another way of saying "low quality." [...] They are low-quality, and have no taste.
The quality of literature in a mother's birthday card to her son isn't particularly great, but that doesn't make the card inauthentic. The picture on the front isn't particularly in fashion, but poor aesthetic tastes doesn't make it inauthentic either. The card isn't authentic because she's written dozens of them over her lifetime, either. A mastered routine doesn't create authenticity.
The card is authentic because its a personal expression of an emotion the Mother is immersed in. The item she produced is an aspect of herself, it's authentic because it is human and serves to express.
Johnny The reason why a barrel is inauthentic is because it does not work in a modern context. It's larping as though we're in the 1800's or something, when.. we're not, and it looks like it was made in a factory. There is no practical use for a barrel sink, and its implementation did not come about organically
Johnny If someone comes up with a rhinoceros beetle vending machine, they will find some way to make it work.
The bug vending machine services no real need, so how is it 'authentic' in the same way the barrel is 'inauthentic'? Judged on this parameter, both are inauthentic. If both are inauthentic, then the 'organic' need something fulfills is not what creates authenticity. The "intellectual ecosystem" of youtube also doesn't fulfill any need, however you also think it was organic and authentic.
The vending machine, or the erstwhile intellectual ecosystem of youtube, are authentic because they are genuine expressions of the self, without alterior motives (such as the monetary incentives of general vending machines or modern youtube).
Johnny I use the term perfected routine to denote a routine that has achieved authenticity. This is a routine that has developed from a lengthy process of trial and error.
In "A Retrospective", he speaks about youtube becoming more 'polished' or refined. By your argument, Youtube must be more authentic than it was before. The videos have been effortfully revised and perfected-- adapted-- to perform as well as possible in it's current ecosystem; by your definition modern Youtube has a perfected routine, and is therefore authentic. Clearly the perfecting of a routine is not what makes something authentic.
Johnny The distinction is what each system is trying to achieve. Capitalism is a system that perfects towards profit; perfectionism is a system that perfects towards quality.
Capitalism, which you call inauthentic and socially deleterious, perfects it's routine toward profit. However, following your dissertation, Capitalism must antithetically also be authentic because it revises a routine in order to perfect. If one can perfect towards different aspects, and some aspects are inauthentic (such as profit), then authenticity does not rely on perfection towards aspects, but on which aspects are perfected.
Johnny racial diversity [....] and mass public works projects are culturally deleterious: they destroy the routines, creating a stressful, alienating, and inauthentic environment.
idk you've just kind of lost the plot. I appreciate the economic critique, but I think you're letting your own prejudice get in the way of your other analysis here. theres no inherent cultural degredation from public works or racial diversity. Your focus on routines has led you to see any interruption in a routine as malignant, however without further outside stimuli-- further change in environment-- how is one meant to "adapt" and therefore become authentic (according to your definition, authenticity comes from adaptation to a context).
TL:DR Overall, theres no accurate scientific way which we can quantify authenticity, it is produced by a deeply emotional and human process. This feels more like thoughtlessly placing cultural phenomena into your personal, rigid, world view based on a percieved importance of routines.