Depends on what AI you are talking about, I am a big fan of ML tools like Demucs, which can extract the individual instruments from songs (still a bit messy, but very impressive how clean it can sound). I am all for development on that front, as it'd really have no downsides (allowing fans of poorly mixed albums to tweak the mixes to their liking, sampling instruments from specific songs becomes a lot easier, just hearing the isolated tracks and getting a better understanding of the individual parts, etc.). If there will be a fork for extracting music and sound effects from films, that'd be fantastic too. It could be great for fandubbing.
As far as AI art models go, just find them kind of shit. I have no clue who legitimately defends them. Drawing is not a craft that is tied to any physical capacity; people paralyzed from the head down can draw, blind people can draw. If you cannot take the miniscule amount of effort it takes to draw on a decent level, then it just seems like an issue on your end. I only find it amusing when people who draw furry porn start crying about coomers choosing to opt for a quicker option to get smut. Pornography is the only field where AI will undeniably replace artists because it has no value outside of appealing to the carnal desires of people. Obviously, there will be "people" who will vouch for AI slop in non-pornographic spaces, but it's not like people haven't vouched for literal shit before. So I don't think it's too much to worry about.
As far as music goes, this one seems pretty easy. If AI-generated music becomes commonplace, I feel like there might be a revival in popularity of more improvisational styles of music like jazz, raga, and maybe even baroque-style improvised polyphony (though that one requires a lot of skill, and sadly, not too many people are that interested in it, doesn't prevent me from wanting to learn it). As with music, it's pretty easy to tell if a robot is playing or if a human is when you're sitting in a cafe or theater and you see them perform on stage. It's going to be a tough time for composers, though. But music, I feel, will have the easiest time getting by in an AI age compared to other forms of art. Not to mention the fact that algorithms trained on classical composers creating music in their styles have been around since I believe the 1970s, and they haven't affected music before, so I don't know why a neural network doing the same thing but more confusingly and less efficiently will have any more impact. The most faddy sounding of all the mediums mentioned, though that also might be because it's the only one I have any decent knowledge about.
