If Ubisoft were calmly notified that this game they saw as a limited life service that would only be appealing while novel and shared with other people, in fact has fans who would enjoy it simply reworked into a solo experience, who would pay for that, they would probably have done so by now.
But this is being treated like a fight because the gamer rabble (with the exception of Ross) are retards who love to fight, saw this as a pretext for a fight, and are now waging a fight. Because degenerate retards love to go moral crusading more than anything else in the world. The language being thrown at Ubisoft is conspiratorial and psychotic. Charges rooted in some kind of moral failure are flying around all over the place. GREED being the big one. Nobody can explain how or why this is GREEDY, and every proposed explanation I've seen is absurd.
Making games unplayable is perhaps a shame in theory, but have we lost any seriously interesting games to this process so far? Ross thinks every game is interesting because he is an autistic sigma male who enjoys looking at the video game equivalents to old chuck e cheese attractions gathering dust in a warehouse. This is not most people. Most people need to be beaten over the head and told that they'll have a hand chopped off next time they try to accuse productive people of moral error for fun.
